Schaakvereniging Vlissingen

Ronde 21, 25 februari 2013

henk — Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:56:05 +0000

Stand na ronde 21

Plaats Pnt WP      SB   P 1 ½ 0    % W    % Z    % Rat TPR
1. Wise,M 14.5 262.5 170.25 10 9 0 1 90% 4 100% 6 83% 1993 1986
2. Baljeu, B 13.0 220.0 128.50 11 7 2 2 73% 6 58% 5 90% 1557 1521
3. Smits, J 13.0 205.0 114.25 18 10 3 5 64% 5 90% 13 54% 1586 1594
4. Snoek, M 12.5 259.0 152.75 4 4 0 0 100% 2 100% 2 100% 1843 —-
5. Roganovic, B 12.0 196.0 97.25 16 9 1 6 59% 9 56% 7 64% 1502 1449
6. Son van, J 11.0 229.0 105.50 17 8 2 7 53% 8 56% 9 50% 1577 1622
7. Massink, H 11.0 227.5 115.00 4 2 1 1 63% 2 50% 2 75% 1918 —-
8. Stroo, R 10.5 215.0 103.75 4 2 0 2 50% 2   0% 2 100% 1533 —-
9. Berkel van, P 10.0 213.5 102.00 3 1 0 2 33% 1   0% 2 50% 1462 —-
10. Graaf de, M 9.5 193.5 78.25 8 3 0 5 38% 4   0% 4 75% 1234 1252
11. Pree de, G 9.0 244.0 96.00 18 5 5 8 42% 11 36% 7 50% 1618 1577
12. Mijnlief, F 6.0 188.0 33.00 13 2 0 11 15% 6   0% 7 29% 1053 1182
13. Jacobse, A 5.0 213.5 41.75 18 2 2 14 17% 12   4% 6 42% 1213 1208

Ronde 20, 18 februari 2013

henk — Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:34:08 +0000

stand na ronde 20

Plaats Pnt WP SB P 1 ½ 0 % W % Z % Rat TPR
1. Wise,M 13.5 234.0 147.75 9 8 0 1 89% 4 100% 5 80% 1980 1935
2. Baljeu, B 13.0 209.0 123.00 10 7 2 1 80% 5 70% 5 90% 1585 1597
3. Smits, J 13.0 180.5 106.25 17 10 3 4 68% 5 90% 12 58% 1603 1622
4. Snoek, M 12.0 235.5 139.50 4 4 0 0 100% 2 100% 2 100% 1843 —-
5. Roganovic, B 12.0 178.0 90.75 15 9 1 5 63% 8 63% 7 64% 1513 1460
6. Massink, H 11.0 210.5 113.00 3 2 1 0 83% 1 100% 2 75% 1931 —-
7. Son van, J 10.0 203.5 85.00 16 7 2 7 50% 7 50% 9 50% 1560 1605
8. Stroo, R 10.0 194.0 93.00 4 2 0 2 50% 2 0% 2 100% 1533 —-
9. Berkel van, P 9.5 193.5 92.75 3 1 0 2 33% 1 0% 2 50% 1462 —-
10. Graaf de, M 9.0 174.0 68.50 8 3 0 5 38% 4 0% 4 75% 1234 1252
11. Pree de, G 8.0 221.0 80.50 17 4 5 8 38% 11 36% 6 42% 1607 1554
12. Mijnlief, F 5.5 175.5 26.25 13 2 0 11 15% 6 0% 7 29% 1053 1182
13. Jacobse, A 4.0 191.0 26.75 17 1 2 14 12% 12 4% 5 30% 1185 1140

Ronde 19, 4 februari 2013

henk — Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:33:27 +0000

Stand na ronde 19

Plaats Pnt WP SB P 1 ½ 0 % W % Z % Rat TPR
1. Smits, J 13.0 160.5 102.25 16 10 3 3 72% 5 90% 11 64% 1606 1624
2. Wise,M 12.5 207.0 126.75 8 7 0 1 88% 3 100% 5 80% 1977 1924
3. Baljeu, B 12.5 187.5 111.75 10 7 2 1 80% 5 70% 5 90% 1585 1597
4. Snoek, M 11.5 213.0 126.75 4 4 0 0 100% 2 100% 2 100% 1843 —-
5. Roganovic, B 11.0 166.0 83.25 14 8 1 5 61% 8 63% 6 58% 1509 1453
6. Massink, H 10.0 187.0 98.25 2 1 1 0 75% 0 0% 2 75% 1931 —-
7. Son van, J 9.5 186.0 77.75 15 7 1 7 50% 7 50% 8 50% 1558 1599
8. Stroo, R 9.5 175.5 83.75 4 2 0 2 50% 2 0% 2 100% 1533 —-
9. Berkel van, P 9.0 174.0 83.00 3 1 0 2 33% 1 0% 2 50% 1462 —-
10. Graaf de, M 8.5 157.5 61.25 8 3 0 5 38% 4 0% 4 75% 1234 1252
11. Pree de, G 7.5 202.0 72.50 16 4 4 8 38% 10 35% 6 42% 1609 1561
12. Mijnlief, F 5.5 159.5 26.25 12 2 0 10 17% 6 0% 6 33% 1053 1167
13. Jacobse, A 4.0 171.0 25.75 16 1 2 13 13% 11 5% 5 30% 1189 1152

Ronde 18 , 28 januari 2013

henk — Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:32:29 +0000

Stand na ronde 18

Plaats Pnt WP SB P 1 ½ 0 % W % Z % Rat TPR
1. Smits, J 12.0 151.0 95.25 15 9 3 3 70% 5 90% 10 60% 1604 1622
2. Wise,M 11.5 187.0 112.75 7 6 0 1 86% 3 100% 4 75% 1974 1884
3. Baljeu, B 11.5 170.5 100.25 9 6 2 1 78% 4 63% 5 90% 1584 1613
4. Snoek, M 11.0 192.5 115.50 4 4 0 0 100% 2 100% 2 100% 1843 —-
5. Roganovic, B 10.0 147.0 69.75 13 7 1 5 58% 7 57% 6 58% 1490 1418
6. Massink, H 9.5 169.0 89.25 2 1 1 0 75% 0 0% 2 75% 1931 —-
7. Son van, J 9.5 167.0 75.25 14 7 1 6 54% 7 50% 7 57% 1577 1635
8. Stroo, R 9.0 157.5 75.00 4 2 0 2 50% 2 0% 2 100% 1533 —-
9. Berkel van, P 8.5 156.0 73.75 3 1 0 2 33% 1 0% 2 50% 1462 —-
10. Graaf de, M 8.0 141.0 54.50 8 3 0 5 38% 4 0% 4 75% 1234 1252
11. Pree de, G 7.5 179.0 68.25 15 4 4 7 40% 9 39% 6 42% 1612 1554
12. Mijnlief, F 5.5 139.0 26.25 11 2 0 9 18% 6 0% 5 40% 1054 1167
13. Jacobse, A 4.0 149.5 24.25 15 1 2 12 13% 10 5% 5 30% 1191 1147

Ronde 17, 14 januari 2013

henk — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:19:36 +0000

Stand na ronde 17

Plaats Pnt WP SB P 1 ½ 0 % W % Z % Rat TPR
1. Baljeu, B 11.5 157.5 97.25 8 6 2 0 88% 3 83% 5 90% 1604 1714
2. Smits, J 11.0 135.5 82.50 14 8 3 3 68% 5 90% 9 56% 1587 1591
3. Snoek, M 10.5 173.0 104.75 4 4 0 0 100% 2 100% 2 100% 1843 —-
4. Wise,M 10.5 164.5 96.25 6 5 0 1 83% 3 100% 3 67% 1972 1855
5. Son van, J 9.5 149.5 72.25 13 7 1 5 58% 6 58% 7 57% 1579 1634
6. Massink, H 9.0 152.0 80.75 2 1 1 0 75% 0 % 2 75% 1931 —-
7. Roganovic, B 9.0 125.0 52.50 12 6 1 5 54% 7 57% 5 50% 1470 1373
8. Stroo, R 8.5 140.0 66.25 4 2 0 2 50% 2 0% 2 100% 1533 —-
9. Berkel van, P 8.0 139.0 65.00 3 1 0 2 33% 1 0% 2 50% 1462 —-
10. Pree de, G 7.5 158.0 64.00 14 4 4 6 43% 8 44% 6 42% 1629 1581
11. Graaf de, M 7.5 124.5 46.75 8 3 0 5 38% 4 0% 4 75% 1234 1252
12. Mijnlief, F 5.0 122.5 21.00 11 2 0 9 18% 6 0% 5 40% 1054 1167
13. Jacobse, A 3.5 137.5 20.50 15 1 2 12 13% 10 5% 5 30% 1191 1147
14. Lous, A 0 0 0 0 –% 0 –% 0 –% 1479 —-

Ronde 16, 7 januari 2013

henk — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:09:45 +0000

Stand na ronde 16

Plaats Pnt WP SB P 1 ½ 0 % W % Z % Rat TPR
1. Baljeu, B 11.0 140.0 87.50 8 6 2 0 88% 3 83% 5 90% 1604 1714
2. Snoek, M 10.0 155.0 95.00 4 4 0 0 100% 2 100% 2 100% 1843 2413
3. Smits, J 10.0 119.5 69.00 13 7 3 3 65% 4 88% 9 56% 1569 1551
4. Wise,M 9.5 142.5 80.25 5 4 0 1 80% 2 100% 3 67% 1969 1831
5. Son van, J 9.5 134.0 70.00 12 7 1 4 63% 6 58% 6 67% 1582 1638
6. Massink, H 8.5 136.0 72.75 2 1 1 0 75% 0 0% 2 75% 1931 —-
7. Roganovic, B 8.5 108.0 43.50 12 6 1 5 54% 7 57% 5 50% 1470 1373
8. Stroo, R 8.0 124.0 58.50 4 2 0 2 50% 2 0% 2 100% 1533 1485
9. Pree de, G 7.5 139.5 60.50 13 4 4 5 46% 8 44% 5 50% 1647 1608
10. Berkel van, P 7.5 123.5 57.25 3 1 0 2 33% 1 0% 2 50% 1462 —-
11. Graaf de, M 7.0 109.0 39.00 8 3 0 5 38% 4 0% 4 75% 1234 1252
12. Mijnlief, F 4.0 107.5 15.00 10 1 0 9 10% 6 0% 4 25% 1032 1082
13. Jacobse, A 3.5 125.5 19.25 14 1 2 11 14% 9 6% 5 30% 1213 1191
14. Lous, A 0 0 0 0 –% 0 –% 0 –% 1479 —-

Ronde 15, 17 december 2012

henk — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:03:27 +0000

Stand na ronde 15

Plaats Pnt WP SB P 1 ½ 0 % W % Z % Rat TPR
1. Baljeu, B 10.0 126.0 78.00 7 5 2 0 86% 3 83% 4 88% 1601 1706
2. Snoek, M 9.5 137.5 85.25 4 4 0 0 100% 2 100% 2 100% 1843 2413
3. Wise,M 9.0 126.5 72.00 5 4 0 1 80% 2 100% 3 67% 1969 1831
4. Smits, J 9.0 108.5 61.00 12 6 3 3 63% 3 83% 9 56% 1568 1570
5. Son van, J 8.5 116.5 58.00 11 6 1 4 59% 6 58% 5 60% 1563 1596
6. Massink, H 8.0 120.0 64.25 2 1 1 0 75% 0 0% 2 75% 1931 —-
7. Roganovic, B 8.0 94.5 38.00 12 6 1 5 54% 7 57% 5 50% 1470 1373
8. Pree de, G 7.5 122.0 56.75 12 4 4 4 50% 7 50% 5 50% 1666 1646
9. Stroo, R 7.5 109.0 51.25 4 2 0 2 50% 2 0% 2 100% 1533 1485
10. Berkel van, P 7.0 108.0 50.00 3 1 0 2 33% 1 0% 2 50% 1462 —-
11. Graaf de, M 6.5 95.0 33.75 8 3 0 5 38% 4 0% 4 75% 1234 1252
12. Mijnlief, F 4.0 92.0 15.00 9 1 0 8 11% 6 0% 3 33% 1033 1085
13. Jacobse, A 3.5 107.0 18.00 13 1 2 10 15% 8 6% 5 30% 1216 1199
14. Lous, A 0 0 0 0 –% 0 –% 0 –% 1479 —-

Ronde 14, 3 december 2012

henk — Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:06:31 +0000

Stand na ronde 14

Plaats Pnt WP SB P 1 ½ 0 % W % Z % Rat TPR
1. Baljeu, B 9.5 109.0 68.25 7 5 2 0 86% 3 83% 4 88% 1601 1706
2. Snoek, M 9.0 120.5 75.50 4 4 0 0 100% 2 100% 2 100% 1843 1413
3. Wise,M 8.5 110.0 62.75 5 4 0 1 80% 2 100% 3 67% 1969 1831
4. Smits, J 8.5 94.5 53.75 11 6 2 3 64% 3 83% 8 56% 1564 1558
5. Son van, J 8.0 100.5 49.25 11 6 1 4 59% 6 58% 5 60% 1563 1596
6. Massink, H 7.5 105.0 56.50 2 1 1 0 75% 0 0% 2 75% 1931 —-
7. Pree de, G 7.0 105.0 47.75 11 4 3 4 50% 6 50% 5 50% 1670 1654
8. Stroo, R 7.0 94.0 43.50 4 2 0 2 50% 2 0% 2 100% 1533 1485
9. Roganovic, B 7.0 82.0 30.00 11 5 1 5 50% 6 50% 5 50% 1468 1372
10. Berkel van, P 6.5 93.5 42.75 3 1 0 2 33% 1 0% 2 50% 1462 —-
11. Graaf de, M 6.5 88.5 32.75 7 3 0 4 43% 3 0% 4 75% 1251 1303
12. Mijnlief, F 4.0 79.5 14.00 8 1 0 7 13% 6 0% 2 50% 1035 1105
13. Jacobse, A 2.5 92.0 9.75 12 0 2 10 8% 8 6% 4 13% 1199 1116

Ronde 13, 26 nov 2012

henk — Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:02:07 +0000

Stand na ronde 13
Plaats Pnt WP SB P 1 ½ 0    % W    %   Z    % Rat TPR
1. Baljeu, B 9.0 93.0 59.00 7 5 2 0 86% 3 83%   4 88% 1601 1706
2. Wise,M 8.5 99.5 61.25 4 4 0 0 100% 2 100%   2 100% 1991 2274
3. Snoek, M 8.0 100.0 60.00 3 3 0 0 100% 1 100%   2 100% 1821 —-
4. Smits, J 8.0 81.5 46.00 10 6 1 3 65% 3 83%   7 57% 1559 1544
5. Son van, J 7.5 86.5 42.50 11 6 1 4 59% 6 58%   5 60% 1563 1596
6. Massink, H 7.0 91.0 49.25 2 1 1 0 75% 0 –%   2 75% 1931 —-
7. Pree de, G 6.5 90.5 40.25 10 4 2 4 50% 5 50%   5 50% 1675 1665
8. Stroo, R 6.5 81.0 37.25 4 2 0 2 50% 2   0%   2 100% 1533 1485
9. Berkel van, P 6.0 80.0 36.00 3 1 0 2 33% 1   0%   2 50% 1462 —-
10. Graaf de, M 6.0 75.5 27.00 7 3 0 4 43% 3   0%   4 75% 1251 1303
11. Roganovic, B 6.0 72.5 25.00 10 4 1 5 45% 6 50%   4 38% 1463 1349
12. Mijnlief, F 3.5 68.5 10.75 8 1 0 7 13% 6   0%   2 50% 1035 1105
13. Jacobse, A 2.5 79.0 9.00 11 0 2 9   9% 7   7%   4 13% 1204 1134
14. Lous, A 0 0 0 0 –%   0 –%   0 –% 1479 —-

Ronde 12 19 nov 2012

henk — Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:00:35 +0000

Stand na ronde 12
Plaats Pnt WP SB P 1 ½ 0    % W    % Z    % Rat TPR
1. Baljeu, B 8.5 79.0 51.00 7 5 2 0 86% 3 83% 4 88% 1601 1706
2. Wise,M 8.0 84.5 52.50 4 4 0 0 100% 2 100% 2 100% 1991 2274
3. Son van, J 7.5 72.0 38.25 10 6 1 3 65% 5 70% 5 60% 1569 1614
4. Snoek, M 7.0 81.5 46.50 2 2 0 0 100% 1 100% 1 100% 1815 —-
5. Smits, J 7.0 69.0 36.25 9 5 1 3 61% 3 83% 6 50% 1544 1502
6. Massink, H 6.5 78.5 43.00 2 1 1 0 75% 0 0% 2 75% 1931 —-
7. Stroo, R 6.5 71.5 36.25 3 2 0 1 67% 1   0% 2 100% 1548 1588
8. Pree de, G 6.0 78.0 34.00 10 4 2 4 50% 5 50% 5 50% 1675 1665
9. Berkel van, P 5.5 69.0 30.25 3 1 0 2 33% 1   0% 2 50% 1462 1405
10. Roganovic, B 5.5 64.0 21.75 9 4 0 5 44% 6 50% 3 33% 1473 1358
11. Graaf de, M 5.0 63.5 20.00 6 2 0 4 33% 3   0% 3 67% 1244 1281
12. Mijnlief, F 3.5 57.5 10.25 7 1 0 6 14% 5   0% 2 50% 1042 1144
13. Jacobse, A 2.0 68.0 5.00 10 0 1 9   5% 6   0% 4 13% 1194 1048
14. Lous, A 0 0 0 –%   0 –%   0 –% 1479 —-